 
                        It wasn't just a win. It was a statement. Australia didn't just chase down India's meager 117 — they dismantled it, without losing a single wicket, in just 11 overs. The 2nd ODI of the Australia Tour of India 2023Dr. Y.S. Rajasekhara Reddy ACA-VDCA Cricket Stadium in Visakhapatnam became the stage for one of the most one-sided ODI performances in recent memory. India, who had won the opener in Mohali, collapsed under relentless pressure, and Australia’s openers — Travis Head and Mitchell Marsh — turned the chase into a clinic. The result? A 10-wicket thrashing that leveled the three-match series at 1-1, setting up a nerve-wracking finale in Ahmedabad.
At 103/9, the match teetered on the edge of a historic collapse. Sean Abbott, who had already taken one wicket, was on a hat-trick. The next ball? Hardik Pandya, attempting a desperate swipe, was caught by Steven Smith. The final wicket — Mohammed Shami, bowled by Starc — came at 117 all out in 26 overs. A run rate of 4.50 wasn’t just poor — it was catastrophic for a side that had scored 188 just two days earlier. Starc finished with 2 for 20, while Ellis and Abbott each claimed one. The bowling was sharp, the fielding relentless. And the batting? A shadow of the unit that had fought back in Mohali.
By the 10th over, the chase was over. Marsh finished on 60 not out off 38 balls, Head on 55 not out off 51. They didn’t just win — they made it look effortless. No pressure. No panic. Just execution. Starc, who had terrorized the Indian top order, didn’t even need to bat. The Australian team, led by Pat Cummins, had planned this. They knew India’s spinners would be tested on a slow pitch. And they knew their openers could exploit it. They were right.
 
And here’s the twist: this wasn’t about luck. It was about preparation. Australia’s bowlers targeted India’s perceived weakness — the middle-order vulnerability against short-pitched deliveries. The data showed India had lost 12 wickets in the 15-30 overs range in their last five ODIs. Australia didn’t just exploit it — they weaponized it.
 
One thing’s certain: the series won’t be decided by a single star. It’ll be decided by depth. By composure. By who blinks first.
Mitchell Starc exploited India’s vulnerability against short, quick deliveries, particularly targeting the top order. He took 2 wickets for just 20 runs in 6 overs, including key dismissals of Rohit Sharma and KL Rahul. His ability to generate pace off the pitch and maintain line under pressure made him nearly unplayable on a slow Visakhapatnam track.
India’s middle order, often reliable in ODIs, lacked rhythm against Australia’s disciplined pace attack. With Kohli and Rahul out early, players like Hardik Pandya and Axar Patel were forced into unfamiliar roles. The lack of back-foot play and poor shot selection under pressure led to a cascade of dismissals — six of the last seven wickets fell for just 14 runs.
Their 115-run stand in just 10.4 overs demoralized India’s bowling attack and nullified any chance of a comeback. Head’s control and Marsh’s power — including a 97-metre six — showed Australia’s ability to dominate from the start. This was the fastest 100-run partnership in an ODI chase against India since 2021, and it set the tone for a historic win.
Australia’s win strengthens their position as the world’s top-ranked ODI team, with a 10-wicket victory over a top-5 side reinforcing their dominance in away conditions. They’ve now won 10 of their last 12 ODIs outside Australia, signaling their adaptability and depth — key traits that could carry them into the 2023 World Cup.
Though Warner didn’t feature in the second ODI, his return is highly likely for the decider in Ahmedabad. His experience against Indian spinners and ability to accelerate early make him a tactical asset. Australia may swap one of their middle-order batsmen for him, depending on pitch conditions.
The Visakhapatnam pitch, traditionally slow and low, was expected to favor spinners. But Australia’s bowlers used the seam and bounce brilliantly, exposing India’s lack of adaptation. The stadium’s 25,000-capacity crowd, usually vocal for India, was unusually subdued — a sign of how completely Australia controlled the game from start to finish.
Write a comment